Another Injunction Against the Military as to Religious Exemptions from COVID Vaccination Mandate

Must read

Trump Slams Biden’s Escalation, Sending Tanks to Ukraine: Warns Next ‘Come the Nukes’

Donald Trump slammed the decision by President Biden to send 31 Abrams M1 tanks to Ukraine, suggesting it...

Report: Consumer Confidence Dwindles as Economic Fears Rise

By Glenn Minnis (The Center Square) Consumers feel 13% less confident about their financial outlook now...

Cory Booker Mocked After Claiming More Americans Died from Gun Violence in 50 Years Than All Wars Combined

Senator Cory Booker was questioned by viewers after claiming to have witnessed more deaths from gun violence in...

Frustrated by Police Inaction, Pro-Lifers Take Up the Work of Law Enforcement

By James Varney for RealClearInvestigations Last June a firebomb ripped through the CompassCare crisis pregnancy center in...

From Judge Steven Merryday’s opinion today in Navy Seal 1 v. Biden (M.D. Fla.):

Here is the short version: Expressly applicable to each branch of the federal government, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) commands the military to grant to a service member harboring a sincerely held religious objection to COVID-19 vaccination a religious exemption from the vaccination (1) unless a compelling  overnmental interest requires the vaccination and (2) unless a good faith evaluation, directed specifically to the singular circumstances of the service member—that is,  directed “to the person” requesting the exemption—demonstrates that no less restrictive means is available to the military reasonably to protect the compelling governmental interest. Under the command of RFRA, the military bears the burden of showing both the existence of a compelling governmental interest and the absence of a less restrictive means of reasonably protecting that interest.

In the instance of Navy Commander and Lieutenant Colonel 2, the Navy and the Marine Corps have failed manifestly to offer the statutorily required demonstration that no less restrictive means is available, and each of the two service members is entitled to preliminary injunctive relief that (1) permits them, pending a final determination on a complete record, to continue to serve without the vaccination and (2) forbids any punitive or retaliatory measure against either by the military pending a final judgment in this action.

The long version follows.

More articles

Latest article

Trump Slams Biden’s Escalation, Sending Tanks to Ukraine: Warns Next ‘Come the Nukes’

Donald Trump slammed the decision by President Biden to send 31 Abrams M1 tanks to Ukraine, suggesting it...

Report: Consumer Confidence Dwindles as Economic Fears Rise

By Glenn Minnis (The Center Square) Consumers feel 13% less confident about their financial outlook now...

Cory Booker Mocked After Claiming More Americans Died from Gun Violence in 50 Years Than All Wars Combined

Senator Cory Booker was questioned by viewers after claiming to have witnessed more deaths from gun violence in...

Frustrated by Police Inaction, Pro-Lifers Take Up the Work of Law Enforcement

By James Varney for RealClearInvestigations Last June a firebomb ripped through the CompassCare crisis pregnancy center in...

UN report labels China ‘a bright spot’

The economic forecast...